![]() |
![]() |
|
INTERVENTION BY THE PERMANENT OBSERVER Monday 25 March 2002
Mr Chairman, Just ten years ago, the important series of International
Conferences on social and developmental themes, which have significantly shaped
international development policy, began in Rio de Janeiro, with the World
Conference on the Environment and Development. The very first principle of the
"Rio Declaration", adopted on that occasion, notes the "human
beings are the centre of concerns for sustainable development". The social and economic evolution which we have witnessed in
these past ten years, with the move towards a knowledge-based, globalized
economy has proven just how correct that affirmation of principle was. It is
human persons who are the focal point of a knowledge-based economy. It is their
initiative and creative ability that are the driving and innovative force of a
modern economy. Pope John Paul II had, earlier, in his Encyclical Letter
Centesimus Annus noted that "whereas at one time the decisive factor of
production was the land, and later capital – understood as a total complex of
the instruments of production – today the decisive factor is increasingly man
himself, that is his knowledge".1
The sad fact, however, as the Pope commented later in the same
document, is that "many people, perhaps the majority today, do not have the
means which would enable them to take their place in an effective and humanly
dignified way within a productive system in which work is truly essential. They
have no possibility of acquiring the basic knowledge which would enable them to
express their creativity and develop their potential".2
Poverty today must be defined not simply in terms of a lack of
economic income, but more in terms of an inability to realise fully that
God-given human potential, with which each person, man or woman, is endowed.
Fighting poverty, which has now been recognized as an essential overarching
dimension of all developmental policy, must therefore be about enabling people
to realise their God-given potential. It is about enhancing human potential.
These reflections about the nature of a modern economy show
that, more than in the past, it may be possible today to forge a new synergy
between economic reflection and human rights reflection. The very nature of a
modern economy offers a possible basis for a renewed human rights approach to
globalization, centred on the capacities of human beings and on the right of
people to be able to realise their capacities fully. Seen in this light, the
right to development should no longer appear, as it did to some, as being in
contrast with market-driven economic policy. The attainment of this right is not
just an understandable human aspiration. It is a prerequisite for the
development of a strong modern economy. The more human potential is realised,
the stronger the economy of a country will be. Likewise, the right to development will not be seen as being
opposed to "good governance". Democracy and good governance are not
just about administration from above. They are essentially about structures that
permit and facilitate the participation of citizens from below, in decisions
that affect their lives. Governance can be said to be functioning well, when
human potential is truly channelled towards creative participation in the
economy and in society. The right to development is linked to the very raison
d’etre of government, in its fullest sense: to ensure the security and the
participation of the people. On the international plane, in turn, a just system
of governance requires that all states, including the poorest, have rightful
access to the decision-making procedures of the organizations which affect their
future. It is a paradox to have to speak in the same breath of
globalisation and marginalization and exclusion. Global should mean inclusive. A
global economic system that leaves large sectors of society on its margins is
not what it claims to be: global. The Holy See expresses the hope that, within the new spirit of
international cooperation concerning development, it will be possible for the
open-ended working group on the Right to Development, chaired by Ambassador
Dembry, to move forward with a constructive consensus around the definition and
realisation of the right to development. I began, Mr Chairman, by speaking of the first in the series of
recent International Conferences, that of Rio. As we deliberate, the community
of nations has just adopted in Monterrey a strategy for financing development.
Once again, the success of that strategy will depend on how it places human
persons at the centre of concerns for sustainable development, on how it directs
the use of financing, traditional and additional, to ensure that people can
realise their potential, and fully exercise the rights as the protagonists of
sustainable development. _________________________________ 1 Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus, n.33. 2
*L’Osservatore Romano, 28.3.2002 p.2.
L'Osservatore Romano. Weekly Edition in English n.14 p.5.
|
|