|
PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR
LEGISLATIVE TEXTS
ACTUS FORMALIS
DEFECTIONIS AB ECCLESIA CATHOLICA
Vatican City, 13 March 2006
Prot. N. 10279/2006
Your Excellency:
For quite some time, a considerable number of Bishops, Judicial
Vicars and others working in the field of canon law have been posing to this
Pontifical Council questions and requests for clarification concerning the
so-called actus formalis defectionis ab Ecclesia catholica mentioned in
canons 1086, § 1, 1117 and 1124 of the Code of Canon Law. The concept therein
presented is new to canonical legislation and is distinct from the other –
rather “virtual” (that is, deduced from behaviors) – forms of “notoriously” or
“publicly” abandoning the faith (cfr. can. 171, § 1, 4°; 194, § 1, 2°; 316, § 1;
694, § 1, 1°; 1071, § 1, 4° and § 2). In the latter circumstances, those who
have been baptized or received into the Catholic Church continue to be bound by
merely ecclesiastical laws (cfr. can. 11).
The issue was carefully examined by the competent Dicasteries of the Holy See in
order to identify, first of all, the theological and doctrinal components of an
actus formalis defectionis ab Ecclesia catholica and then in turn the
requirements or juridical formalities that would be necessary so that such an
action would constitute a true “formal act” of defection.
After having received the decision of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the
Faith concerning the theological and doctrinal elements, and after subsequently
examining the entire matter in Plenary Session, this Pontifical Council
communicates the following to the Presidents of Episcopal Conferences:
1. For the abandonment of the Catholic Church to be validly
configured as a true actus formalis defectionis ab Ecclesia so that the
exceptions foreseen in the previously mentioned canons would apply, it is
necessary that there concretely be:
a) the internal decision to leave the Catholic Church; b) the realization and external manifestation of that decision; and c) the reception of that decision by the competent ecclesiastical authority.
2. The substance of the act of the will must be the rupture of
those bonds of communion – faith, sacraments, and pastoral governance – that
permit the Faithful to receive the life of grace within the Church. This means
that the formal act of defection must have more than a
juridical-administrative character (the removal of one’s name from a Church
membership registry maintained by the government in order to produce certain
civil consequences), but be configured as a true separation from the
constitutive elements of the life of the Church: it supposes, therefore, an
act of apostasy, heresy or schism.
3. The juridical-administrative act of abandoning the Church does
not per se constitute a formal act of defection as understood in the
Code, given that there could still be the will to remain in the communion of the
faith.
On the other hand, heresy (whether formal or material), schism and
apostasy do not in themselves constitute a formal act of defection if they are
not externally concretized and manifested to the ecclesiastical authority in the
required manner.
4. The defection must be a valid juridical act, placed by a
person who is canonically capable and in conformity with the canonical norms
that regulate such matters (cfr. cann.124-126). Such an act must be taken
personally, consciously and freely.
5. It is required, moreover, that the act be manifested by the
interested party in written form, before the competent authority of the Catholic
Church: the Ordinary or proper pastor, who is uniquely qualified to make the
judgment concerning the existence or non-existence of the act of the will as
described above in n. 2.
Consequently, only the convergence of the two elements – the
theological content of the interior act and its manifestation in the manner
defined above – constitutes the actus formalis defectionis ab Ecclesia
catholica, with the corresponding canonical penalties (cfr. can. 1364, § 1).
6. In such cases, the competent ecclesiastical authority
mentioned above is to provide that this act be noted in the baptismal registry
(cfr. can. 535, § 2) with explicit mention of the occurrence of a “defectio
ab Ecclesia catholica actu formali”.
7. It remains clear, in any event, that the sacramental bond of
belonging to the Body of Christ that is the Church, conferred by the
baptismal character, is an ontological and permanent bond which is not lost
by reason of any act or fact of defection.
With the certainty that the Bishops of your Conference, conscious
of the salvific dimension of ecclesiastical communion, will well understand the
pastoral motivations underlying these norms, I welcome this opportunity to
renew my sentiments of fraternal esteem.
Faithfully yours in the Lord,
Julián Card. Herranz President
Bruno Bertagna Secretary
This notification was approved by the Supreme Pontiff, Benedict XVI, who
directed that it be transmitted to all Presidents of Episcopal Conferences.
|