MESSAGE OF HIS HOLINESS
POPE JOHN PAUL II
FOR THE CELEBRATION OF THE
WORLD DAY OF PEACE
1 JANUARY 1987
DEVELOPMENT AND SOLIDARITY: TWO KEYS TO PEACE
1. An Appeal to All ...
My predecessor Pope Paul VI issued an appeal to
all people of good will to celebrate a World Day of Peace on the first day of
each civil year, as both a hope and promise that peace "would dominate the
development of events to come" (AAS 59, 1967, p. 1098). Twenty years
later, I repeat this appeal, addressing myself to every member of the human
family. I invite you to join with me in reflecting on peace and in celebrating
peace. To celebrate peace in the midst of difficulties - such
as those of today - is to proclaim our trust in humanity.
Because of this trust, I address my appeal to everyone,
confident that together we can learn to celebrate peace as the universal desire
of all peoples everywhere. All of us who share that desire can thus become one
in our thoughts and in our efforts to make peace a goal that can be attained by
all for all.
The theme I have chosen for this year's Message takes its
inspiration from that deep truth about humanity: we are one human family.
By simply being born into this world, we are of one inheritance and one stock
with every other human being. This oneness expresses itself in all the richness
and diversity of the human family: in different races, cultures, languages and
histories. And we are called to recognize the basic
solidarity of the human family as the fundamental condition of our life
together on this earth.
1987 also marks the twentieth anniversary of the publication of Populorum
Progressio. This celebrated Encyclical of Paul VI was a solemn appeal for
concerted action in favour of the integral development of peoples (cf. Populorum
Progressio, 5). Paul VI's phrase - "Development is the new name for
peace" ( ibid., 76, 87) - specifies one of the keys in our search for
peace. Can true peace exist when men, women and children cannot live in full
human dignity? Can there be a lasting peace in a world ruled by relations -
social, economic and political - that favour one group or nation at the expense
of another? Can genuine peace be established without an effective recognition of
that wonderful truth that we are all equal in dignity, equal because we have
been formed in the image of God who is our Father?
2. ... to Reflect on Solidarity ...
This Message for the Twentieth World Day of Peace is closely
linked to the Message I addressed to the world last year on the theme
North-South, East-West: Only One Peace. In that Message, I said: " ... the
unity of the human family has very real repercussions for our life and for our
commitment to peace ... It means that we commit ourselves to a new
solidarity,
the solidarity of the human family ... a new relationship, the social solidarity
of all" ( No.
4).
To recognize the social solidarity of the human family brings
with it the responsibility to build on what makes us one. This means promoting
effectively and without exception the equal dignity of all as human
beings endowed with certain fundamental and inalienable human rights. This
touches all aspects of our individual life, as well as our life in the family,
in the community in which we live, and in the world. Once we truly grasp that
we are brothers and sisters in a common humanity, then we can shape our
attitudes towards life in the light of the solidarity which makes us one. This
is especially true in all that relates to the basic universal project: peace.
In the lifetime of all of us, there have been moments and events
that have bound us together in a conscious recognition of the oneness of
humanity. From the time that we were first able to see pictures of the world
from space, a perceptible change has taken place in our understanding of our
planet and of its immense beauty and fragility. Helped by the accomplishments of
space exploration, we found that the expression "the common heritage of all
mankind" has taken on a new meaning from that date. The more we share in
the artistic and cultural riches of one another, the more we discover our common
humanity. Young people especially have deepened their sense of oneness through
regional and worldwide sports events and similar activities, deepening their
bonds of brotherhood and sisterhood.
3. ... as Put into Practice ...
At the same time, how often in recent years have we had occasion
to reach out as brothers and sisters to help those struck by natural disaster or
subjected to war and famine. We are witnessing a growing collective desire -
across political, geographical or ideological boundaries - to help the less
fortunate members of the
human family. The suffering, still so tragic and protracted, of
our brothers and sisters in Sub-Saharan Africa is giving rise to forms and
concrete expressions of this solidarity of human beings everywhere. Two of the
reasons why I was pleased in 1986 to confer the Pope John XXIII International
Peace Prize on the Catholic Office for Emergency Relief and Refugees (COERR) of
Thailand were first, to be able to call the attention of the world to the
continuing plight of those who are forced from their homelands; and secondly to
highlight the spirit of cooperation and collaboration that so many groups - Catholic and otherwise
- have displayed in responding to the need of these sorely
tried homeless people. Yes, the human spirit can and does respond with great
generosity to the suffering of others. In these responses we can find a growing
realization of the social solidarity that proclaims in word and deed that we are
one, that we must recognize that oneness, and that it is an essential element
for the common good of all individuals and nations.
These examples illustrate that we can and do cooperate in many
ways, and that we can and do work together to advance the common good. However,
we must do more. We need to adopt a basic attitude towards humanity and the
relationships we have with every person and every group in the world. Here we
can begin to see how the commitment to the solidarity of the whole human family
is a key to peace. Projects that foster the good of humanity or good will among
peoples are one step in the realization of solidarity. The bond of sympathy and
charity that compels us to help those who suffer brings our oneness to the fore
in another way. But the underlying challenge to all of us is to adopt an
attitude of social solidarity with the whole human family and to face all social
and political situations with this attitude.
Thus, for example, the United Nations Organization has
designated 1987 as the International Year of Shelter for the Homeless. By so
doing it is calling attention to a matter of great concern, and supporting an
attitude of solidarity - human, political and economic - towards millions of
families deprived of the environment essential for proper family life.
4. ... and as Obstructed
Examples unfortunately abound of obstacles to solidarity, of
political and ideological positions which do in fact affect the achievement of
solidarity. These are positions or policies that ignore or deny the fundamental
equality and dignity of the human person. Among these, I am thinking in
particular of:
- a xenophobia that closes nations in on themselves or which leads
governments to enact discriminatory laws against people in their own countries;
-
the closing of borders in an arbitrary and unjustifiable way so that people are
effectively deprived of the ability to move and to better their lot, to be
reunited with their loved ones, or simply to visit their family or reach out in
care and understanding to others;
- ideologies that preach hatred or distrust, systems that set up artificial
barriers. Racial hatred, religious intolerance, class divisions are all too
present in many societies, both openly and covertly. When political leaders
erect such divisions into internal systems or into
policies regarding relationships with other nations, then these prejudices
strike at the core of human dignity. They become a powerful source of
counteractions that further foster division, enmity, repression and warfare.
Another evil, which in this past year brought so much suffering to people and
havoc to society, is terrorism.
To all of these, effective solidarity offers an antidote. For if
the essential note of solidarity is to be found in the radical equality of all
men and women, then any and every policy that contradicts the basic dignity and
human rights of any person or group of persons is a policy that is to be
rejected. On the contrary, policies and programmes that build open and honest
relationships among peoples, that forge just alliances, that unite people in
honourable cooperation, are to be fostered. Such initiatives do not ignore the
real linguistic, racial, religious, social or cultural differences among
peoples; nor do they deny the great difficulties in overcoming long-standing
divisions and injustice. But they do give pride of place to the elements that
unite, however small they may appear to be.
This spirit of solidarity is a spirit that is open to dialogue.
It finds its roots in truth, and needs truth to develop. It is a spirit that
seeks to build up rather than to destroy, to unite rather than to divide. Since
solidarity is universal in its aspiration, it can take many forms. Regional
agreements to promote the common good and encourage bilateral negotiations can
serve to lessen tensions. The sharing of technology or information to avert
disasters or to improve the quality of life of people in a particular area will
contribute to solidarity and facilitate further measures on a wider level.
5. To Reflect on Development ...
Perhaps in no other sector of human endeavour is there greater
need of social solidarity than in the area of development. Much of what Paul VI
said twenty years ago in his now celebrated Encyclical is especially applicable
today. He saw with great clarity that the social question had become worldwide
(cf. Populorum Progressio, 3 ). He was among the first to call attention
to the fact that economic progress in itself is insufficient, that it demands
social progress (cf. ibid., 35). Above all, he insisted that development
must be integral, that is, the development of every person and of the whole
person (cf. ibid., 14-21 ). This was, for him, a complete humanism: the
fully-rounded development of the person in all his or her dimensions and open to
the Absolute, which "gives human life its true meaning" (ibid.,
42). Such a humanism is the common goal that must be sought for everyone.
"There can be no progress towards the complete development of man", he
said, "without the simultaneous development of all humanity in the spirit
of solidarity" (ibid., 43).
Now,
twenty years later, I wish to pay tribute to this teaching of Paul VI. In the
changed circumstances of today, these profound insights, especially regarding
the importance of a spirit of solidarity for development, are still valid and
shed great light on new challenges.
6. ... and its Applications Today
When we reflect on commitment to solidarity in the field of
development, the first and most basic truth is that development is a question
of people. People are the
subjects of true development, and the aim of true development is people. The
integral development of people is the goal and measure of all development
projects. That all people are at the centre of development is a consequence of
the oneness of the human family; and this is irrespective of any technological
or scientific discoveries that the future may hold. People must be the focus of
all that is done to improve the conditions of life. People must be active
agents, not passive recipients, in any true development process.
Another principle of development as it relates to solidarity
is the need to promote values that truly benefit individuals and society. It
is not enough to reach out and help those in need. We must help them to
discover the values which enable them to build a new life and to take their
rightful place in society with dignity and justice. All people have the right
to pursue and attain what is good and true. All have the right to choose those
things that enhance life, and life in society is by no means morally neutral.
Social choices have consequences that either promote or debase the true good
of the person in society.
In the field of development, and especially of development
assistance, programmes have been offered which claim to be "value
free" but which in fact are countervalues to life. When one considers
government programmes or aid packages that virtually force communities or
countries to accept contraception programmes and abortion schemes as the price
of economic growth, then one has to say clearly and forcefully that these
offers violate the solidarity of the human family because they deny the values
of human dignity and human freedom.
What is true of personal development through the choice of
values that enhance life applies also to the development of society. Whatever
impedes true freedom militates against the development of society and of
social institutions. Exploitation, threats, forced subjection, denials of
opportunities by one sector of society to another are unacceptable and
contradict the very notion of human solidarity. Such activities, both within a
society and among nations, may unfortunately seem successful for a while.
However, the longer such conditions exist, the more likely they are to be the
cause of still further repression and increasing violence. The seeds of
destruction are already sown in institutionalized injustice. To deny the means
of achieving development to any sector of a given society or to any nation can
only lead to insecurity and social unrest. It breeds hatred and division and
destroys the hope for
peace.
The solidarity that fosters integral development is
that which protects and defends the legitimate freedom of every person and the
rightful security of every nation. Without this freedom and security, the very
conditions for development are missing. Not only individuals but also nations
must be able to share in the choices which affect them. The freedom that nations
must have to ensure their growth and development as equal partners in the family
of nations is dependent on reciprocal respect among them. Seeking economic,
military or political superiority at the expense of the rights of other nations
places in jeopardy any prospects for true development or true peace.
7. Solidarity and Development: Two Keys to Peace
For these reasons, I have proposed that we reflect this year
on solidarity and development as keys to peace. Each of these realities has
its own specific meaning. Both are necessary for the goals we seek. Solidarity
is ethical in nature because it involves an affirmation of value about
humanity. For this reason, its implications for human life on this planet and
for international relations are also ethical: our common bonds of humanity
demand that we live in harmony and that we promote what is good for one
another. These ethical implications are the reason why solidarity is a basic
key to peace.
In this same light, development takes on its full meaning. It
is no longer a question merely of improving certain situations or economic
conditions. Development ultimately becomes a question of peace, because it
helps to achieve what is good for others and for the human community as a
whole.
In the context of true solidarity, there is no danger of
exploitation or the misuse of development programmes for the benefit of the
few. Rather, development thus becomes a process involving different members of
the same human family and enriching them all. As solidarity gives us the
ethical basis to act upon, development becomes the offer that brother makes to
brother, so that both can live more fully in all the diversity and
complementarity that are the hallmarks of human civilization. Out of this
dynamic comes the harmonious "tranquillity of order" which is true
peace. Yes, solidarity and development are two keys to peace.
8. Some Modern Problems ...
Many of the problems that face the world in this beginning of
1987 are indeed complex, and seem almost insoluble. Yet, if we believe in the
oneness of the human family, if we insist that peace is possible, our common
reflection on solidarity and development as keys to peace can shed much light
on these critical issues.
Certainly the continuing problem of the external debt of many
of the developing countries could be looked at with new eyes if everyone
concerned would consciously include these ethical considerations in the
evaluations made and the solutions proposed. Many
aspects of this issue - protectionism, prices of raw materials, priorities in
investment, respect for obligations contracted as well as consideration of the
internal condition of the debtor countries - would benefit from seeking in
solidarity those solutions that promote stable development.
With reference to science and technology, new and powerful
divisions are appearing between the technological haves and have-nots. Such
inequalities do not promote peace and harmonious development, but rather
compound already existing situations of inequality. If people are the subject
of development and the goal to which it tends, a more open sharing of
applicable technological advances with less technologically advanced countries
becomes an ethical imperative of solidarity, as does a refusal to make of such
countries the testing area for doubtful experiments or a dumping ground for
questionable products. International agencies and various States are making
notable efforts in these fields. Such efforts are an important contribution to
peace.
Recent contributions on the relationship between disarmament
and development - two of the most crucial problems facing the world today
- point
to the fact that current East-West tensions and North-South
inequalities present serious threats to world peace. It is becoming
increasingly clear that a peaceful world, one in which the security of peoples
and of States is ensured, calls for active solidarity in efforts for both
development and disarmament. All States are inevitably affected by the poverty
of other States; all States inevitably suffer from the lack of results in
disarmament negotiations. Nor
can we forget the so-called local wars that take a heavy toll of human life.
All States have responsibility for world peace and this peace cannot be ensured until a security based on arms is gradually replaced
with a security
based on the solidarity of the human family. Once again, I appeal for
further efforts to reduce arms to the minimum necessary for legitimate
defence, and for increased measures to aid the developing countries to become
self-reliant. Only thus can the community of States live in true solidarity.
There is yet another threat to peace, one that throughout the
world saps the very roots of every society: the breakdown of the family. The
family is the basic cell of society. The family is the first place where
development occurs or does not occur. If it is healthy and wholesome, then the
possibilities for the integral development of the whole of society are great.
Too often, however, this is not the case.
In too many societies, the family has become a secondary
element. It is relativized by various forms of interference and it often fails
to find in the State the protection and support that it needs. Not
infrequently it is deprived of the just means to which it has a right so that
it can grow and provide an atmosphere where its members can flourish. The
phenomena of broken families, of family members forced to separate for
survival, or unable even to find shelter to begin or to maintain themselves as
families, are all signs of moral underdevelopment and of a society that has
confused its values. A basic measure of the health of a people or nation is
the importance it gives to conditions for the development of families.
Conditions that are beneficial to families promote the harmony of the society
and nation, and this in turn fosters peace at home and in the world.
Today we see the frightening spectre of young children who are
abandoned or forced into the marketplace. We find children and young people in
shanty towns and in large impersonal cities where they find meagre sustenance
and little or no hope for the future. The breakdown of the family structure,
the dispersal of its members, especially the very young, and the consequent
ills visited upon them - drug abuse, alcoholism, transient and meaningless
sexual relations, exploitation by others - all are countersigns to the
development of the whole person that is fostered through the social solidarity
of the human family. To look into the eyes of another person and to see the
hopes and anxieties of a brother or sister is to discover the meaning of
solidarity.
9. ... that Challenge Us All
Peace is at stake: civil peace within nations and world peace
among States (cf. Populorum
Progressio,
55). Paul VI saw this clearly twenty years ago. He saw the intrinsic connection between the demands of justice in the
world and the possibility of peace for the world. It is no mere coincidence
that the very year of the publication of Populorum Progressio also marked the
institution of the annual World Day of Peace, an initiative which I was glad
to continue.
Paul VI already expressed the heart of this year's reflection
on solidarity and development as keys to peace when he stated: "Peace
cannot be limited to a mere absence of war, the result of an ever precarious
balance of forces. No, peace is something that is built up day after day in
pursuit of an order intended by God, which implies a more perfect form of
justice among people" (ibid., 76 ).
10. The Commitment of Believers and Especially Christians
All of us who believe in God are convinced that this
harmonious order for which all peoples long cannot come about solely through
human efforts,
indispensable though they be. This peace - personal peace and peace for others
- must at the same time be sought in prayer and meditation. In saying this, I
have before my eyes and in my heart the deep experience of the recent World
Day of Prayer for Peace in Assisi. Religious leaders and representatives of
the Christian Churches and Ecclesial Communities and the World Religions gave
living expression to solidarity in prayer and meditation for peace. It was a
visible commitment on the part of every participant - and of the many others who
j oined with us in spirit - to seek peace, to be peacemakers, to do everything
possible, in the deep solidarity of the
spirit to work for a society in which justice will flourish and peace abound
(cf. Ps 72:7).
The Just Ruler whose description the Psalmist sets before us
is one who deals out justice to the poor and suffering. " He has pity on
the weak and the needy, and saves the lives of the needy. From oppression and
violence he redeems their life ..." (vv. 13-14). These words are before
our eyes today as we pray that the longing for peace which marked the meeting
in Assisi may be the moving force for all believers and in a special way for
Christians.
For Christians can discern in these inspired words of the
Psalms the figure of our Lord Jesus Christ, the One who brought his peace to
the world, the One who healed the wounded and afflicted, announced good news
to the poor and set at liberty those who were oppressed (cf. Lk 4:18).
Jesus Christ is the One whom we call "our peace", and who "has
broken down the dividing wall of hostility" (Eph 2: 14), in order
to make peace. Yes. Precisely this wish to make peace, seen at the Assisi
meeting, also encourages us to give some thought to the manner of celebrating
this World Day in the future.
We too are called to be like Christ, to be peacemakers through
reconciliation, to be cooperators with him in the task of bringing peace to
this earth by furthering the cause of justice for all peoples and nations. And
we must never forget those words of his which summarize every perfect
expression of human solidarity: "Treat others the way you would have them
treat you" (Mt 7:12). When this commandment is broken, Christians
should realize that they are causing a division and committing a sin. This sin
has serious effects on the community of believers and on the whole of society. It offends
God himself, who is the creator of life and the one who keeps it in being.
The grace and wisdom that Jesus shows even from the time of hi
s hidden lif e in Nazareth with Mary and Joseph (cf. Lk 2: 51f) is a
model for our own relations with one another in the family, in our nations, in
the world. The service of others through word and deed that marks the public
life of Jesus is a reminder to us that the solidarity of the human family has
been radically deepened. It has been given a transcendent aim that ennobles
all our human efforts for justice and peace. Finally, the ultimate act of
solidarity that the world has known - the death of Jesus Christ on the Cross for
all - opens up to us Christians the way we are to follow. If our work for peace
is to be fully effective, it must share in the transforming power of Christ,
whose death gives life to all people born into this world, and whose triumph
over death is the final guarantee that the justice which solidarity and
development require will lead to lasting
peace.
May the acceptance that Christians give to Jesus
Christ as Saviour and Lord direct all their efforts. May their
prayers sustain them in their commitment to the cause of peace through the
development of peoples in the spirit of social solidarity.
11. Final Appeal
And so together we begin another year: 1987. May it be a year
in which humanity finally puts aside the divisions of the past, a year in
which people seek peace with all their heart. My hope is that this Message may
be
an occasion for each one to deepen his or her commitment to
the oneness of the human family in solidarity. May it be a spur encouraging us
all to seek the true good of all our brothers and sisters in an integral
development that fosters all values of the human person in society.
At the beginning of this Message I explained that the theme of
solidarity impelled me to address this to everyone, to every man and woman in
this world. I now repeat this call to every one of you, but I wish to make a
special appeal in the following way:
- to
all of you, Government leaders and those responsible for international
agencies: in order to ensure peace I appeal to you to redouble your efforts
for the integral development of individuals and nations;
- to all of you who participated in the World Day of Prayer
for Peace in Assisi or who were joined spiritually with us at that time: I
appeal to you that we may bear witness together to peace in the world;
- to all of you who travel or who are involved in cultural
exchanges: I appeal to you to be conscious instruments of greater mutual
understanding, respect and esteem;
- to you, my younger brothers and sisters, the youth of the
world: I appeal to you to use every means to forge new bonds of peace in
fraternal solidarity with young people everywhere.
And dare I hope to be heard by those who practise violence and
terrorism? Those of you who will at least listen to my voice, I beg you
again, as I have in the past, to turn away from the violent pursuit of your
goals - even if the goals themselves are just. I beg you to
turn away from killing and harming the innocent. I beg you to
stop undermining the very fabric of society. The way of violence cannot obtain
true justice for you or for anyone else. If you want, you can still change. You
can profess your own humanity and recognize human solidarity.
I appeal to all of you, wherever you are, whatever you are
doing, to see the face of a brother or sister in every human being. What unites
us is so much more than what separates and divides us : it is our common
humanity.
Peace is always a gift of God, yet it depends on us too. And the
keys to peace are within our grasp. It is up to us to use them to unlock all the
doors!
From the Vatican, 8 December 1986.
JOANNES PAULUS PP. II
|