APPENDIX I
Pastoral Significance of the Visit ad limina Apostolorum
(cf. arts. 28-32)
That pastoral spirit, prominent in the revision of the
Apostolic Constitution on the Roman Curia, has also led to attaching greater
significance to bishops’ visits ad limina Apostolorum,
bringing a more adequate light to bear on the pastoral importance which the
visits have gained in the present life of the Church.
1. These visits, as we know, take place when the
bishops, joined as they are to the Apostolic See with the bond of communion
and presiding in charity and service over the particular Churches throughout
the world, set out at certain appointed times for Rome to visit the tombs of
the Apostles.
On the one hand, these visits give the bishops an
opportunity to sharpen their awareness of their responsibilities as successors
of the Apostles and to feel more intensely their sense of hierarchical
communion with the successor of Peter. On the other hand, the visits in some
way constitute the highest and most central point in that universal ministry
that the Holy Father is carrying out when he embraces his brother bishops, the
pastors of the particular Churches, and takes up with them the business of
sustaining their mission in the Church.
2. These ad limina visits bring into full view
this movement or life-blood between the particular Churches and the Church as
a whole that theologians call perichoresis. The process may be compared
to the diastolic-systolic movements within the human body when the blood is
carried to the outer limbs and from there flows back to the heart.
Some trace and example of a first ad limina visit is
found in Paul’s letter to the Galatians, in which the Apostle tells the
story of his conversion and the journey he undertook among the pagans.
Although he knew that he had been called and instructed personally by Christ
who had conquered death, he wrote these words: "[Then] did I go up to
Jerusalem to meet Cephas. I stayed fifteen days with him" (Gal 1:18).
"It was not until fourteen years later that I travelled up to Jerusalem
again [...] I expounded the whole gospel that I preach the gentiles, to make
quite sure that the efforts I was making and had already made should not be
fruitless" (Gal 2: 1-2).
3. The natural result of this meeting with Peter’s
successor, first guardian of the deposit of truth passed on by the Apostles,
is to strengthen unity in the same faith, hope and charity, and more and more
to recognize and treasure that immense heritage of spiritual and moral wealth
that the whole Church, joined with the bishop of Rome by the bond of
communion, has spread throughout the world.
During the ad limina visit, two men stand face to
face together, namely the bishop of a certain particular Church and the bishop
of Rome, who is also the successor of Peter. Both carry on their shoulders the
burden of office, which they cannot relieve themselves from, but they are not
at all divided one from the other, for both of them in their own way
represent, and must represent, the sum total of the faithful, the whole of the
Church, and the sum total of the bishops, which together constitute the only
"we and us" in the body of Christ. It is in their communion that the
faithful under their care communicate with one another, and likewise the
universal Church and particular Churches communicate with each other.
4. For all these reasons, the ad limina visits
express that pastoral solicitude which thrives in the universal Church.
Here we see the meeting of the pastors of the Church, joined together in a
collegial unity that is based on apostolic succession. In this College, each
and every one of the bishops displays that solicitude of Jesus Christ, the
Good Shepherd, which all have received by way of inheritance.
This indeed is the highest ideal of the apostolate that has
to be carried out in the Church and which concerns the bishops together with
the successor of Peter. For each one of them stands at the centre of all the
apostolate, in all its forms, that is carried out in each particular Church,
joined at the same time in the universal dimension of the Church as a whole.
All this apostolate, again in all its forms, demands and includes the work and
help of all those who are building the Body of Christ in the Church, be it
universal or particular: the priests, men and women religious consecrated to
God, and the laypeople.
5. Now if the ad limina visits are conceived and
viewed in this way, they come to be a specific moment of that communion
which so profoundly determines the nature and essence of the Church, as it was
admirably indicated in the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, especially in
chapters II and III. Given that society nowadays is moving towards a greater
unification, and the Church experiences herself as "a sign and instrument
[...] of communion with God and of unity among the whole of humankind,"
it seems utterly necessary that a permanent communication between particular
Churches and the Apostolic See should be promoted and built up, especially by
sharing pastoral solicitude regarding questions, experiences, problems,
projects and ideas about life and action.
When pastors converge on Rome and meet together, there comes
to pass a remarkable and most beautiful sharing of gifts from among all those
riches in the Church, be they universal or local and particular, in accordance
with that principle of catholicity by which "each part contributes its
own gifts to other parts and to the whole Church, so that the whole and each
of the parts are strengthened by the common sharing of all things and by the
common effort to attain to fullness in unity."
Furthermore and in the same way, ad limina visits aim
not only at a direct sharing of information but also and especially to an
increase and strengthening of a collegial structure in the body of the
Church, bringing about a remarkable unity in variety.
This communication in the Church is a two-way movement. On
the one hand, the bishops converge towards the centre and the visible
foundation of unity. We are referring to that unity which, when it comes to
full bloom, casts its benefits on their own groupings or conferences, through
each pastor’s responsibilities and awareness of his functions and of their
fulfilment, or through the collegial spirit of all the pastors. On the
other hand, there is the commission "which the Lord confided to Peter
alone, as the first of the apostles" which serves the ecclesial community
and the spread of her mission, in such a way that nothing is left untried that
may lead to the advancement and preservation of the unity of the faith and the
common discipline of the whole Church, and all become more and more aware that
the responsibility of proclaiming the Gospel everywhere throughout the world
falls chiefly on the body of the pastors.
6. From all the principles established above to
describe this most important process, one may deduce in what way that
apostolic custom of "seeing Peter" is to be understood and put into
practice.
First of all the ad limina visit has a sacred
meaning in that the bishops with religious veneration pay a visit to the
tombs of Peter and Paul, the Princes of the Apostles, shepherds and pillars of
the Church of Rome.
Then the ad limina visit has a personal meaning
because each individual bishop meets the successor of Peter and talks to him face
to face.
Finally, the visit has a curial meaning, that is, a hallmark
of community, because the bishops enter into conversation with the
moderators of the dicasteries, councils, and offices of the Roman Curia. The
Curia, after all, is a certain "community" that is closely joined
with the Roman Pontiff in that area of the Petrine ministry which involves
solicitude for all the Churches (cf. 2 Cor 11:28).
In the course of the ad limina visit, the access that
the bishops have to the dicasteries is of a two-fold nature:
— First, it gives them access to each individual agency of
the Roman Curia, especially to questions that the agencies are dealing with
directly according to their competence, questions that have been referred by
law to those agencies because of their expertise and experience.
— Second, bishops coming from all over the world, where
each of the particular Churches can be found, are introduced to questions of
common pastoral solicitude for the universal Church.
Bearing in mind this specific point of view, the
Congregation for Bishops, in consultation with the other interested
Congregations, is preparing a "Directory" for publication so that
the ad limina visits can receive long- and short-term preparation and
thus proceed smoothly.
7. Each and every bishop — by the very nature of that
"ministry" that has been entrusted to him — is called and invited
to visit the "tombs of the Apostles" at certain appointed times.
However, since the bishops living within each territory,
nation or region, have already gathered together and now form conferences of
bishops — collegial unions with an excellent, broad theoretical basis — it
is highly appropriate that the ad limina visits should proceed
according to this collegial principle, for that carries much significance
within the Church.
The institutes of the Apostolic See, and especially the
nunciatures and apostolic delegations as well as the dicasteries of the Roman
Curia, are most willing to offer assistance in order to ensure that ad
limina visits be made possible, are suitably prepared and proceed well.
To sum up: the institution of the ad limina visit is
an instrument of the utmost value, commanding respect because it is an ancient
custom and has outstanding pastoral importance. Truly, these visits express
the catholicity of the Church and the unity and communion of the College of
Bishops, qualities rooted in the successor of Peter and signified by those
holy places where the Princes of the Apostles underwent martyrdom, qualities
of a theological, pastoral, social, and religious import known to all.
This institution therefore is to be favored and promoted in
every possible way, especially at this moment of the history of salvation in
which the teachings and magisterium of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council
shine out with ever brighter light.
APPENDIX II
The Collaborators of the Apostolic See as a
Work Community
(cf. arts. 33-36)
1. The principal feature characterizing the revision of
the Apostolic Constitution Regimini Ecclesiæ universæ, so that it
might be adapted to the needs that arose after its promulgation, was certainly
to emphasize the pastoral nature of the Roman Curia. Viewed in this way, the
true character of the functions fulfilled in the midst, as it were, of the
Apostolic See shines bright and clear, so that they provide the Supreme
Pontiff with suitable instruments to carry out the mission entrusted to him by
Christ Our Lord.
Through that unique ministry which he offers to the Church,
the Supreme Pontiff strengthens his brothers in the faith (Lk 22:32) —
the pastors, namely, and the Christian faithful of the universal Church —
looking only to nourish and guard that Church communion in which "there
are also particular Churches that retain their own traditions, without
prejudice to the Chair of Peter which presides over the whole assembly of
charity (cf. S. Ignatius M., Ad Rom., pref., Funk, I,
p. 252), and protects their legitimate variety and at the same time keeps
watch to ensure that individual differences, so far from being harmful to
unity, actually serve its cause."
2. By constant toil, this Petrine ministry reaches out
to the whole world and claims the help of persons and other means throughout
the Church. Help it does receive in a direct and privileged manner from all
those who are called to perform various functions in the Roman Curia and in
the various institutions which compose the structure of the Holy See, be they
in holy orders as bishops and priests, or men and women consecrated to God in
the religious families and secular institutes, or Christian lay men and women.
Out of this diversity emerge certain quite remarkable
contours and the considerable importance of these duties, which have
absolutely no equivalent at any other level of civil society, with which by
its very nature indeed the Roman Curia cannot be compared. On this foundation
stands that leading idea of the work community constituted by all those who,
being well nourished with the one and the same faith and charity and
"united, heart and soul" (Acts 4:32), make up those structures
of collaboration just mentioned. Therefore those who under whatever title and
in any manner help in the universal mission of the Supreme Pontiff to foster
the Church community, have a further call to set up a communion of purpose, of
undertakings, and of rules of behaviour, that deserves the name of community
more than does any other form of grouping.
3. The letter of Pope John Paul II of 20 November 1982
on the meaning of work performed for the Apostolic See, took pains to
elaborate on the characteristics of this work community. The letter outlined
its nature, unique and yet endowed with a variety of functions. All those who
share in the "single, incessant activity of the Apostolic See,"
become in some way brothers. From this consideration the letter went on to
conclude that those who shared in this work should be aware "of that
specific character of their positions. In any case, such a consciousness has
ever been the tradition and pride of those who have chosen to dedicate
themselves to that noble service." The letter adds: "This
consideration applies to clerics and religious and to laity as well; both to
those who occupy posts of high responsibility and to office and manual workers
to whom auxiliary functions are assigned."
The same letter points out the special nature of the
Apostolic See, which, to preserve the exercise of spiritual freedom and its
true and visible immunity, constitutes a sovereign State in its own right and
yet "does not possess all ordinary characteristics of a political
community," different from all others. The practical results of this
condition are seen in the operation of its affairs, especially as regards its
economic organization. In the Apostolic See there is a total absence of a
taxation system that other states have by right, and it has no economic
activity producing goods and income. The "prime basis of sustenance of
the Apostolic See is the spontaneous offerings" by reason of a certain
universal interdependence emanating from the Catholic family and elsewhere,
which to a marvellous degree expresses that communion of charity over which
the Apostolic See presides in the world and by which it lives.
From this basic condition flow certain consequences on the
practical level and in the behaviour among the staff of the Holy See —
"the spirit of thrift," "a readiness always to take account of
the real but limited financial possibilities of the Holy See and their
source," "a profound trust in Providence." And, over and beyond
all these qualities, "those who work for the Holy See must therefore have
the profound conviction that their work above all entails an ecclesial
responsibility to live in a spirit of authentic faith, and that the
juridical-administrative aspects of their relationship with the Apostolic See
stand in a particular light."
4. The remuneration owed to the clerical and lay staff
at the Holy See, according to their personal conditions of life, is regulated
by the major principles of the social teachings of the Church, which have been
made quite clear by the magisterium of the Popes from the time of the
publication of Leo XIII’s Encyclical Letter Rerum novarum up to John
Paul II’s Encyclicals Laborem exercens and Sollicitudo rei
socialis.
While labouring under a grave lack of economic means, the
Holy See makes every effort to measure up to the heavy obligations to which it
is held with regard to its workers — even granting them certain benefit
packages — but subject to that basic situation which is peculiar to the
Apostolic See and has been explained in the Pope’s Letter, the fact, namely,
that the Holy See cannot be compared to any other form of State, since it is
deprived of the ordinary means of generating income, except the income that
comes from universal charity. However the Holy See is conscious of the fact
— and the same Apostolic Letter makes this clear — that the active
cooperation of everybody, and especially of the lay members of the staff, is
necessary so that regulations and interrelations may be protected, as well as
those rights and duties that arise out of "social justice"
when it is correctly applied to the relations between worker and employer. On
this subject, the Apostolic Letter has pointed out the help that workers
associations can give in this respect, like the "Associazione Dipendenti
Laici Vaticani," recently founded through productive talks among the
various administrative levels to promote the spirit of solicitude and justice.
The Apostolic Letter however has cautioned us to beware lest this kind of
group distort the leading ideal that must govern the work community of the See
of Peter. The letter says: "However, a lapse of this type of organization
into the field of extremist conflict and class struggle does not correspond to
the Church’s social teaching. Nor should such associations have a political
character or openly or covertly serve partisan interests or other interests
with quite different goals."
5. At the same time the Supreme Pontiff declared his
firm conviction that associations of this kind — like the one mentioned
above — "set forward work problems and develop continuous and
constructive dialogue with the competent organisms [and] will not fail to take
account in every case of the particular character of the Apostolic See."
Now since the lay staff of Vatican City had very much at
heart that there be an ever more suitable fine-tuning of working conditions
and of everything touching the labour question, the Supreme Pontiff provided
that "suitable executive documents" be prepared "for forthering
a work community according to the principles set forth by means of suitable
norms and structures."
The outcome of the Pope’s concern is now "The Labour
Office of the Apostolic See" (L.A.A.S.), which is established by an
Apostolic Letter given motu proprio together with the document
specifying in detail the membership of the Labour Office, its authority, its
functions, its regulatory and advisory organs as well as its proper norms to
facilitate a fair, rapid, and efficient process; furthermore, as it has been
just newly set up, this Office needs a reasonable period of time to operate ad
experimentum so that its regulations and procedures may be confirmed and
its true and objective importance reviewed. This motu proprio and the
regulations of the new Labour Office are being published at the same time,
together with the promulgation of the Apostolic Constitution on the renewal of
the Roman Curia.
6. The chief purpose of the Labour Office — apart
from the practical ends for which it was brought into existence — is to
promote and preserve a work community among the various levels of staff of the
Apostolic See, especially the laypeople. The spirit of this community should
be characteristic of all who have been called to the privilege and
responsibility of serving the Petrine ministry.
Again and again it is to be explained that these workers are
in duty bound to foster and cultivate within themselves a special awareness of
the Church, an awareness making them ever more fitted to fulfill the functions
entrusted to them, no matter what these may be. These functions are not mere
give and take arrangements — a certain labour given and a certain wage
received —, as may happen in institutions in civil society; they constitute
rather a service offered to Christ himself "who came not to be served but
to serve" (Mt 20:28).
Therefore all the workers of the Holy See, clergy and laity,
out of a sense of honour and sincerely conscious of their own duty before God
and themselves, must resolve that their lives as priests and lay faithful
shall be lived at an exemplary level, as is proposed by God’s commandments,
by the laws of the Church and by the pronouncements of the Second Vatican
Council, especially in Lumen gentium, Presbyterorum ordinis, and
Apostolicam actuositatem. However, this is a free decision, by which
with full awareness certain responsibilities are taken on, the force of which
is felt not only on the individuals but also on their families and even on the
actual work community composed of all the collaborators of the Holy See.
Well may we be asked "of whose spirit we are" (cf.
Lk 9:55 Vulg.): thus the Pope writes at the end of the Apostolic
Letter. So each and all, in searching their own sincerity as human beings and
as Christians, are bound to be faithful to those promises, and to keep those
bonds that they freely accepted when they were chosen to labour at the Holy
See.
7. To keep in view the principles and norms indicated
by the Pope in the afore-mentioned Apostolic Letter to the cardinal secretary
of state, the full text is printed below. In fact, this document must be
considered as the foundation and sign of the whole pattern of interdependence
in order to maintain full cooperation and understanding within the work
community at the service of the Apostolic See.
Apostolic Letter Apostolica Sedes by John Paul II
on the meaning of work performed for the
Apostolic See
1. The Apostolic See, in exercising its mission, has
recourse to the valid and precious work of the particular community made up of
those men and women, priests, religious and laity who devote their efforts in
their dicasteries and offices to the service of the universal Church.
Charges and duties are assigned to the members of this community; each of
those charges and duties has its own purpose and dignity, in consideration
both of the objective content and value of the work done and of the person who
accomplishes it.
This concept of community, applied to those who aid the bishop of Rome in
his ministry as pastor of the universal Church, permits us first of all to
define the unitary character of functions which are nonetheless diverse among
themselves. All persons called to perform them really participate in the
single, incessant activity of the Apostolic See; that is, in that
"concern for all the Churches" (cf. 2 Cor. 11:28) which enlivened
the apostles’ service from the earliest times and is the prerogative today
in outstanding measure of the successors of St. Peter in the Roman See. It is
very important that those who are associated in any way with the Apostolic See’s
activity should have a consciousness of that specific character of their
positions. In any case, such a consciousness has ever been the tradition and
pride of those who have chosen to dedicate themselves to that noble service.
This consideration applies to clerics and religious and to laity as well,
both to those who hold posts of high responsibility, and to office and manual
workers to whom auxiliary functions are assigned. It applies to persons
attached to the service of the same Apostolic See more directly, inasmuch as
they work in those organisms which are altogether known in fact under the name
of "Holy See;" and it applies to those who are in the service of the
Vatican City State, which is so closely linked with the Apostolic See.
In the recent Encyclical Laborem exercens, I recalled the principal
truths of the "gospel of labour" and Catholic doctrine on human
work, a doctrine always alive in the Church’s tradition. There is need for
the life of that singular community which operates sub umbra Petri —
in Peter’s shadow —, in such immediate contact with the Apostolic See, to
conform itself to these truths.
2. In order to apply these principles to reality, their objective
significance must be borne in mind, together with the specific nature of the
Apostolic See. This latter does not have the general form of true states even
though, as I noted above, the entity described as the Vatican City State is
closely linked with it; for true states are subjects of the political
sovereignty of particular societies. On the other hand, the Vatican City State
is sovereign, yet does not possess all ordinary characteristics of a political
community. It is an atypical state. It exists as a fitting means of
guaranteeing the exercise of the spiritual liberty of the Apostolic See; that
is, as the means of assuring real and visible independence of the same in its
activity of government for the sake of the universal Church, as well as of its
pastoral work directed toward the whole human race. It does not possess a
proper society for the service of which it was established nor does it base
itself upon forms of social action which usually determine the structure and
organization of every other state. Furthermore, the persons who aid the
Apostolic See or even cooperate in government of the Vatican City State are
with few exceptions not citizens of this state. Nor, consequently, do they
have the rights and duties (those to do with taxation in particular) which
ordinarily arise from belonging to a state.
The Apostolic See does not develop nor can it develop economic activity
proper to a state, since it transcends the narrow confines of the Vatican City
State in a much more important respect and extends its mission to the whole of
the earth. Production of economic goods and enrichment by way of revenues are
foreign to its institutional purposes. Besides the revenues of the Vatican
City State and the limited income afforded by what remains of the funds
obtained on the occasion of the Lateran Pacts as indemnity for the Papal
States. and ecclesiastical goods passed to the Italian State, the prime basis
of sustenance of the Apostolic See is the spontaneous offerings provided by
Catholics throughout the world and by other men of good will. This corresponds
to a tradition having its origin in the Gospel and the teachings of the
apostles. This tradition has taken on various forms over the centuries in
relation to the economic structures prevailing in various eras. In conformity
with that tradition it must be affirmed that the Apostolic See may and ought
to make use of the spontaneous contributions of the faithful and other people
of good will, without having recourse to other means which might appear to be
less respectful of the character proper to the Apostolic See.
3.The above-mentioned material contributions are the expression of a
constant and moving solidarity with the Apostolic See and the activity carried
out by it. My profound gratitude goes out to such great solidarity. It ought
to be with a sense of responsibility commensurate with the nature of the
contributions on the part of the Apostolic See itself, its individual organs
and the persons working in them. That is to say that the contributions are to
be used solely and always according to the dispositions and will of those
offering them: for the general intention which is maintenance of the Apostolic
See and the generality of its activities or for particular purposes
(missionary, charitable, etc.), when these have been expressly mentioned.
Responsibility and loyalty toward those who show their solidarity with the
Apostolic See through their aid and share its pastoral concern in some way are
expressed in scrupulous fidelity to all tasks and duties assigned, as well as
in the zeal, hard work and professional spirit which ought to distinguish
whoever participates in the same Apostolic See’s activities. Right intention
must likewise be always cultivated, so as to exert watchful administration —
in terms of their purposes — over both material goods which are offered and
over what is acquired or conserved by means of such goods. This includes
safeguarding and enhancing the See of Peter’s precious inheritance in the
religious-cultural and artistic fields.
In making use of means allocated for these ends, the Apostolic See and
those directly collaborating with it must be distinguished not only by a
spirit of thrift, but also by readiness always to take account of the real but
limited financial possibilities of the Holy See and their source. Obviously
such interior dispositions of mind ought to be well assimilated, becoming
ingrained in the minds of religious and clerics through their training. But
neither should they be lacking from the minds of laity who through their free
choice accept working for and with the Apostolic See.
Moreover, all those who have particular responsibilities in running
organisms, offices and services of the Apostolic See, as well as those
employed in various functions, will know how to join this spirit of thrift
with constant application to making the various activities ever more
effective. This can be done through organization of work based, on the one
hand, on full respect for persons and the valid contribution made by each
according to his proper abilities and functions and, on the other hand, upon
use of appropriate structures and technical means, so that the activity
engaged in corresponds more and more to the demands of service to the
universal Church. Recourse shall be had to everything that experience, science
and technology teach; efforts will be made in this way to use human and
financial resources with greater effectiveness by avoiding waste,
self-interest and pursuit of unjustified privileges, and at the same time by
promoting good human relations in every sector and the true and rightful
interests of the Apostolic See.
Along with such commitment should go a profound trust in Providence, which,
through the offerings of good people, will not allow a lack of the means to
pursue the Apostolic See’s proper ends. Should a lack of means impede
accomplishment of some fundamental objective, a special appeal may be made to
the generosity of the people of God, informing them of needs which are not
sufficiently well known. In the normal way, however, it is fitting to be
content with what bishops, priests, religious institutes and faithful offer
spontaneously, since they themselves can see or discern rightful needs.
4. Many of those working with the Apostolic See are clerics. Since they
live in celibacy, they have no families to their charge. They deserve
remuneration proportional to the tasks performed and capable of assuring them
a decent manner of living and means to carry out the duties of their state,
including responsibilities which they may have in certain cases toward parents
or other family members dependent on them. Nor should the demands of orderly
social relationships be neglected, particularly and above all their obligation
to assist the needy. This obligation is more impelling for clerics and
religious than for the laity, by reason of their evangelical vocation.
Remuneration of the lay employees of the Apostolic See should also
correspond to the tasks performed, taking into consideration at the same time
their responsibility to support their families. Study should therefore be
devoted, in a spirit of lively concern and justice, to ascertaining their
objective material needs and those of their families, including needs
regarding education of their children and suitable provision for old age, so
as to meet those needs properly. The fundamental guidelines in this sector are
to be found in Catholic teaching on remuneration for work. Immediate
indications for the evaluation of circumstances can be obtained from examining
experiences and programs of the society — in particular, the Italian society
— to which almost all lay employees of the Apostolic See belong and in which
they at any rate live.
A valid collaborative function may be performed by workers’ associations
such as the Association of Vatican Lay Employees, which recently came into
existence, in promoting that spirit of concern and justice, through
representing those working within the Apostolic See. Such associations take on
a specific character within the Apostolic See. They are an initiative in
conformity with the Church’s social teaching, for the Church sees them as
one instrument for better assuring social justice in relations between worker
and employer. However, a lapse of this type of organization into the field of
extremist conflict and class struggle does not correspond to the Church’s
social teaching. Nor should such associations have a political or openly or
covertly serve partisan interests or other interests with quite different
goals.
I express confidence that associations such as that now existing and just
mentioned will perform a useful function in the work community, operating in
solid harmony with the Apostolic See, by taking inspiration from the
principles of the Church’s social teaching. I am likewise certain that as
they set forward work problems and develop continuous and constructive
dialogue with the competent organisms they will not fail to take account in
every case of the particular character of the Apostolic See, as pointed out in
the initial part of this letter.
In relation to what has been expounded, Your Eminence will wish to prepare
suitable executive documents for furthering a work community according to the
principles set forth by means of suitable norms and structures.
5. I emphasized in the Encyclical Laborem exercens that the
worker’s personal dignity requires expression in a particular relationship
with the work entrusted to him. This relationship is objectively realizable in
various ways according to the kind of work undertaken. It is realized
subjectively when the worker lives it as "his own," even though he
is working "for wages." Since the work in question here is performed
within the Apostolic See and is therefore marked by the characteristics
already mentioned, such a relationship calls for heartfelt sharing in that
"concern for all the Churches" which is proper to the Chair of
Peter.
Those who work for the Holy See must therefore have the profound conviction
that their work above all entails an ecclesial responsibility to live in a
spirit of authentic faith, and that the juridical-administrative aspects of
their relationship with the Apostolic See stand in a particular light.
The Second Vatican Council provided us with copious teaching on the way in
which all Christians, clerics, religious and laity can and ought to make such
ecclesial concern their own.
So it seems necessary for all, especially those working with the Apostolic
See, to deepen personal consciousness above all of the universal apostolic
commitment of Christians and that arising from each one’s specific vocation:
that of the bishop, of the priest, of religious, of the laity. The answers to
the present difficulties in the field of human labor are to be sought in the
sphere of social justice. But they must also be sought in the area of an
interior relationship with the work that each is called upon to perform. It
seems evident that work — of whatever kind — carried out in the employment
of the Apostolic See requires this in a quite special measure.
Besides the deepened interior relationship, this work calls for reciprocal
respect, if it is to be advantageous and serene, based on human and Christian
brotherhood by all and for all concerned. Only when it is allied with such
brotherhood (that is, with love of man in truth), can justice manifest itself
as true justice. We must try to find "of what spirit we are" (cf. Lk. 9:55, Vulg.).
These latter questions have hardly been touched on here. They cannot be
adequately formulated in administrative-juridical terms. This does not exempt
us, however, from the search and effort necessary for making operative
precisely within the circle of the Apostolic See that spirit of human work
which comes from our Lord Jesus Christ.
As I entrust these thoughts, Most Reverend Cardinal, to your attentive
consideration, I call down an abundance of the gifts of divine assistance upon
the future commitment which putting them into practice requires. At the same
time I impart my benediction to you from my heart and willingly extend it to
all those who offer their meritorious service to the Apostolic See.
JOHN PAUL II
Copyright © Libreria Editrice Vaticana